Good Article

Race to the Bottom: "

Last year Geraldine Ferraro called Barack Obama's race an
advantage. 'If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this
position,' she said to a California newspaper, the Daily
Breeze. 'He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And
the country is caught up in the concept.' Now Jimmy Carter says
his race is a disadvantage. Which is it?

Bill Clinton cast Obama's early primary success in the South as a
Jesse Jackson-style fluke. Now the same liberals who defended
Clinton against race-baiting charges attribute Obama's lack of
success to racism in the South.

Carter says Americans don't think Obama is qualified to lead. So
did Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries. So did her
feminist supporters. Gloria Steinem said Obama enjoyed an unfair
racial and gender advantage over Hillary: Black males, she noted
acidly, got the vote before women. George McGovern agreed, saying
'I have a feeling that in this country where we're at today in
our thinking, it's going to be harder to elect a woman than to
elect a black man.'

Where was Carter then? Obama faced more racial discrimination
during the Democratic primaries than he faces today. Conservative
opposition to him these days is based on policy differences, as
Obama himself acknowledges; liberal opposition to him during the
primaries wasn't.

Many liberals agreed with his policies, but out of a kind of
white liberal paternalism thought that he should wait his turn.
Hillary at one point condescendingly implied that Obama could
serve as her apprentice for eight years. And long before the
'birthers,' one of her chief advisers, Mark Penn, thought it
preposterous that America would elect someone with Obama's
foreign-sounding name and time spent in Indonesia.

If anybody saw Obama as an Affirmative Action president waiting
to happen, it was the running mate of Jimmy Carter's vice
president. If anybody is assuming the worst of a race
reflexively, it is Jimmy Carter himself. And how is it that one
of the most unsuccessful politicians of modern times could have
such an acute understanding of the people's moods and
preferences?

The left sees racism in conservative opposition to Obama's health
care proposal even as they cast it as an identical replay to
opposition under a white president, Bill Clinton. They have seen
it all before, yet somehow it is new and racist.

But then, almost anything qualifies as racism in their eyes. Even
that old opposition to Bill Clinton. Author Toni Morrison saw
racism in his impeachment proceedings, which transformed Clinton
into the 'first black president.'

In the left's 'conversation about race,' evidence is irrelevant.
Conservatism is automatically equated with racism. Jimmy Carter's
malicious and willful assertion would never be treated as
front-page news otherwise. Nor would NAACP President Benjamin
Jealous be able to say without any proof whatsoever to the
Washington Post that an 'ambiguous, uncommitted middle'
of racists exist in the country, which the 'Republican Party's
far-right-wing contingent is definitely fighting hard for.'

It says a lot about the twisted victimology of left-wing identity
politics that the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons are more
inclined to embrace Obama as a 'black president' in his failures
than in his successes. Recall that as Obama went from strength to
strength in the Democratic primaries, Jackson was caught in an
off-camera moment disparaging him as a sell-out upstart in the
crudest terms imaginable, a comment that makes Joe Wilson's look
tame. Now that Obama is failing they feel more comfortable with
him.

The Democratic primaries pitted feminists against racialists and
blacks of Jesse Jackson's generation against those of Obama's.
The nation had largely moved beyond race. But the Democrats
hadn't. They were still, as Ferraro revealed, 'caught up in the
concept.'

"